Category
Recent Posts
- The Logic of Interoperability: Australia's Acquisition of the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter
- Can Nations Succeed?
- Foreign Relations in the Gilded Age: A British Free-Trade Conspiracy?
- The Civil War's Forgotten Transatlantic Tariff Debate and the Confederacy's Diplomacy of Free Trade
- Case Note: National Federation of Independent Business v Sibelius
Archive
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- September 2011
- July 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- June 2009
- April 2009
- December 2008
- October 2008
- July 2008
- December 2007
- October 2007
Publications FeedAustralia, the US, and the Vietnam and Iraq Wars: "Hound Dog, not Lapdog"
5 July 2012
By Lloyd Cox and Brendon O'Connor
In this article, Maquarie University's Lloyd Cox and the US Studies Centre's associate professor in American politics Brendon O'Connor refute the portrayal of Australia as America’s pliant ally in the Vietnam and Iraq Wars, instead arguing that Australian leaders saw such involvement as strategic opportunities to strengthen the Australian–American alliance. In the case of the Vietnam War particularly, the Australian government also saw these conflicts as a way to draw America into greater military engagement in their region. Cox and O'Connor's interpretation follows earlier revisionist scholarship on the Vietnam War, but is strengthened by new archival evidence. In the case of the 2003 Iraq War, their position is inevitably more provisional due to the lack of archival material. However, after interviewing senior government officials to better understand the Howard government’s motivations for military involvement in Iraq, they discern a similar pattern of strategic motivation. The article concludes with a discussion of the costs and benefits of using wars to strengthen the Australian–American alliance. Read article
Comments
Have your say
Next: The Logic of Interoperability: Australia's Acquisition of the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter
Previous: Survey: Australian Attitudes Towards the US - Part I
VIDEOS & INTERVIEWS
US-Taliban peace talks proposed
Lecturer Adam Lockyer looks at the likely outcome of proposed peace talks between US officials and Taliban leaders.
Trans-Pacific trade and a rising China
CEO Bates Gill looks at the implications of a rising China for the Asia-Pacific and how the Trans-Pacific Partnership is shaping the region.
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Jim Thornton
12:15 AM on Wed 11 July 2012
Very well written and researched. In my opinion, President Clinton was reluctant to send ground troops to East Timor because of the recent events in Mogadishu. That and the need to balance relations with Indonesia which is also an American ally.