Hint: It's not because they're too busy

By James Morrow in Sydney

12 April 2010


The other day Lesley Russell pointed out that right-wingers who refuse to fill in their census forms are only cheating themselves.

Turns out, they're, like, totally not the only ones ...

Read More


Bookmark and Share

Print This Post 0 Comments

The political is not personal

By James Morrow in Sydney

7 April 2010


A lovely story out of today's Political Wire serves as a salutary reminder about the need to preserve civility in politics:

Read More

At an Oklahoma town hall meeting, Sen. Tom Coburn (R-OK) defended Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi against character attacks from Fox News, reports Capitol News Connection.

While discussing his policy disagreements with Pelosi, Coburn said "she's a nice lady," which brought hisses and hoots from the crowd.

Said Coburn: "Come on now. She is nice -- how many of you all have met her? She's a nice person. Just because somebody disagrees with you doesn't mean they're not a good person... So don't catch yourself being biased by Fox News that somebody is no good. The people in Washington are good. They just don't know what they don't know."

A few months ago I had dinner with a prominent Republican congressman and his wife who were in town, and they both reported the same thing - namely, that when policy was off the table, they both got on famously with Nancy Pelosi. (I also discovered that she and her husband own a vineyard in the Napa Valley, which is another tick in the "can't be all bad column").

But Coburn's last point is also important: The political class does not know what it does not know. And this, I think, is the cause for so much of the anger that has been fermenting - so to speak - in the rest of America.

Earlier this week Jonathan wondered if the divide between conservatives and liberals was really as simple as the notion that one loved government while the other loathed it. I think this misses the point: It's not so much that Democrats are enamored with government (though there are certain segments of the Left, particularly in academia and journalism, that have always been fascinated by power and love authoritarian governments for their ability to "get things done"). It is that they have a far more optimistic and expansive about the appropriate role for the state.

But, as Coburn suggests and history proves, the centre cannot ever possibly know enough to effectively govern in most areas of life. To take it a step further, in attempting to do so, the state robs people of the dignity and autonomy it claims to deliver. Thus Americans hear of schemes to force them to buy health insurance that run roughshod over the Constitution and quite appropriately react by saying "thanks, but no thanks." Likewise, those on what can roughly be described as the Right in the US, Australia, and throughout the West are not fans of the constant low-level bullying - whether in the name of saving money, extending lives, or "saving the planet" - that sees their choices about how to raise their children, what to eat, or even how to light their homes restricted. Democrats and their counterparts around the world have far less compunction about extending the ambit of government and, by extension, a soft authoritarianism.

A few weeks ago, just after he announced his retirement, Australian Senator Nick Minchin told John Birmingham, "I think conservative parties here and around the world have a much more suspicious view, a much more realistic, sober and sceptical view about what governments should and shouldn't do, and what they can and can't achieve."

I think that's about right. It's not the question of loving or hating the state, it's about being realistic about what it is right, proper and possible for it to achieve.

UPDATE: In further good news, it turns out Obama is not, repeat not, the anti-Christ. Phew!

Hide


Bookmark and Share

Print This Post 0 Comments

The Tea Party next door

By James Morrow in Sydney

5 April 2010


More bad news for the Democrats: attempts to demonise the Tea Party as a bunch of fringe-dwelling right wingers may backfire, badly, if this survey reported in The Hill is any guide:

Read More

The national breakdown of the Tea Party composition is 57 percent Republican, 28 percent Independent and 13 percent Democratic, according to three national polls by the Winston Group, a Republican-leaning firm that conducted the surveys on behalf of an education advocacy group.

Say what you will about the source, this tends to confirm that the White House's and the media's narrative (it is often hard to tell them apart!) about nationalised health care and other Obama projects is misleading, perhaps deliberately so. Far from radicals and rednecks, they are drawing heavily from the ranks the Left desperately needs to avoid disaster in November.

Hide


Bookmark and Share

Print This Post 0 Comments

Krugman defended

By James Morrow in Sydney

5 April 2010


Tim Blair reads a profile of the New York Times' Paul Krugman so you don't have to, but I must take issue with his poking fun at the fact that the Nobel laureate's cats are named Albert Einstein and Doris Lessing.

There's nothing wrong with naming pets after admired figures in history or politics. Here in the Morrow household, the resident Jack Russell is named Maggie, in honour of the pioneering woman politician, Margaret Thatcher.

Read More

You can see the resemblance, can't you?

Hide


Bookmark and Share

Print This Post 3 Comments

One born every minute

By James Morrow in Sydney

1 April 2010


Of all the grubby deals that made to get Barack Obama's health care plan over the line, the one with Catholic pro-life Democrats led by Rep Bart Stupak had to be among the grubbiest. The deal was a simple one: the Stupak faction would drop their objection to language in the bill permitting taxpayer-funded terminations and allow the bill to go through. In exchange, Barack Obama would sign an Executive Order promising that no federal money would in fact go to subsidise the procedure.

Never mind that when he came to power, Barack Obama promised not to use such "signing statements", which were a bete noir of the Left during the Bush administration. As it turns out, Obama's Executive Order was just a distraction as his administration continued to push a tough pro-abortion line not just for America but the rest of the world.

Read More

Here's Secretary of State Hillary Clinton speaking in Canada, as part of what was an incredibly blunt - some would say undiplomatic - speech in Ottawa, slamming Canada's prime minister for not including abortion in a plan to combat maternal mortality to be unveiled at an upcoming G8 summit:

"You cannot have maternal health without reproductive health ... And reproductive health includes contraception and family planning and access to legal, safe abortion", she said.

Thus Obama might promise not to fund the practice at home, but he'll send his Secretary of State to bull in on a close allies' affairs to insist on its promotion abroad.

As with everything in this administration, one must always be on the lookout for distractions: nods to conservatives in the name of compromise disguise a more radical agenda, one that he himself flagged during his presidential campaign with his promise to be a "transformative" president.

In the meantime, add Bart Stupak and his mates to the long list of people and groups turned into dupes and rubes by the Obama agenda.

Hide


Bookmark and Share

Print This Post 1 Comments

Diplomat in Chief strikes again

By James Morrow in Sydney

1 April 2010


Not content with having gotten India off-side over Australia's maladroit handling of attacks on overseas students, Kevin Rudd is now working assiduously at offending the Americans - or at least a certain population of them:

Reports news.com.au:

AUSTRALIAN Prime Minister Kevin Rudd has hit back at a jibe by US actor/comedian Robin Williams that Australians are just "English rednecks".

Williams, who recently toured Australia, made the comment while appearing as a guest on the popular "Late Night with Dave Letterman Show", the Herald Sun reports.

"The Australians are basically English rednecks. 'You down there, how are ya? Good to see you. Hello','' he said.

Speaking to Triple M radio show host Eddie McGuire in Melbourne on Wednesday, Mr Rudd said: "First of all, I think Robin Williams should go and spend a bit of time in Alabama before he frames comments about anyone being particularly redneck."

 "That's my first response."

Well, he certainly told Mr Williams, didn't he?

Read More

As helpful reader ARMJ who passed this item on to me writes, "And what other stereotypes of Americans does Rudd hold? New Yorkers are what? Jewish bankers? Tennessee or West Virginia? Hillbillies? How about Chicago? Italian mobsters? It is astonishing that a leader of an American ally who also claims foreign affairs as his strong suit would so easily be provoked into making such a disparaging remark based on outdated naive stereotypes. And of course he didn’t think for a minute how that remark might offend Americans and put Australia into a bad light and impact on our economic and other interests. It’s yet another example of what a cad he is seen to be overseas and how that behaviour adversely impacts Australia’s interest. He’s simply not taken seriously anywhere."

Hide


Bookmark and Share

Print This Post 40 Comments

Violent Dems

By James Morrow in Sydney

31 March 2010


One of the ironclad laws of the American media is that only Democrats are allowed to be legitimately angry. When those on the Right, be they Republicans, conservatives, "Tea Partiers", or even worse those scary libertarians who just want to leave everyone alone take it to the street, it is generally reported as a sign that the lunatics have taken over the asylum. The American media has been all over this idea in recent days, with Australia's own Laurie Oakes (no link, unfortunately) getting into the act with a risible column in this past Saturday's Daily Telegraph. The logic is basically that Republicans are all a half-step away from crazy, and their leaders' language is pushing them over the brink.

Read More

Of course, it's not hard to prove this narrative completely false, which is one of the reason why the so-called mainstream media is seen as less and less credible in the eyes of increasing numbers of Americans. How else to account for the breathless reporting that a brick was thrown through the window of the offices of Congressman Steve Driehaus - offices that happen to be on the 30th floor of a Cincinatti skyscraper? (Real bricks, not thrown by imaginary giants, have actually landed in Republican offices, meanwhile).

Indeed when it comes to violence from the Left one never hears quite as much about it even if it is a very real phenomenon. For example, did you hear about the man who was arrested for threatening to kill Republican Congressman Eric Cantor? If you lived in America, likely not: the arrest of the two-time Obama donor with the Faulknerian name Norman Leboon for making anti-Semitic threats to bring about the Jewish legislator's "final Yom Kippur" was comprehensively skipped or glossed over by the US television networks.

And while the rhetoric of Republicans is uinder constant scrutiny, Nobel Laureate is allowed to advocate burning Democrat apostate Joe Lieberman in effigy.

Look, there is no excuse for violence in the political sphere. But there is also no excuse for lazy reporting that seeks to plant the idea that you don't have to be crazy to be against ObamaCare, but it sure helps.

Hide


Bookmark and Share

Print This Post 1 Comments

Jonathan is Right

By James Morrow in Sydney

26 March 2010


Jonathan, you are right. I really should not be so hard on former Enron advisor Paul Krugman. He's too big and easy a target, given that his career trajectory has taken him from respected economist to partisan shill. How else to explain why he frequently contradicts himself now that the party in power has changed? Or the fact that embarrasing corrections are routinely tacked on to his columns, something which suggests to me that he (or his editors) should have been more cautious before accusing Newt Gingrich of racism - though I suppose that would not have fit the narrative. I suspect this is what you meant, Jonathan, when you wrote of something that "suggests insufficient inquiry at best" - as opposed to my linking to an article about a poll that provides a link to the raw data at the very top of the page, hiding in plain sight. 


Bookmark and Share

Print This Post 0 Comments

Confused

By James Morrow in Sydney

26 March 2010


I'm confused, Jonathan. How are slandering a public figure as a racist ("may have misrepresented some comments", indeed) on the one hand and reporting on the top-line results of a poll while providing a link to the data on the other even remotely in the same ballpark?

More to the point, if people are so disenchanted with Republicans (as you claim), then why do you also predict they will "gain a lot of seats" in November?

Is it because 55% of likely voters, now that the thing is signed, want it repealed?

Or is it because as much as they might like the idea of free healthcare, they also know it's not affordable and will fundamentally - and negatively - change the relationship between citizen and state, giving government a whole new set of excuses to meddle in their lives?

Anyway we can argue polls all you like, but I don't think it's all that interesting. The only poll that matters is on Election Day.


Bookmark and Share

Print This Post 0 Comments

Lunatic (with a) fringe

By James Morrow in Sydney

25 March 2010


We've been having too much fun with health care around these parts, so in the spirit of reminding both McCainiacs and Obamalytes that 2008's presidential race could have had a far, far worse outcome - and to show Australians that American politics is not just the playground of angry Tea Partiers and creepy, controlling Congressmen - I present GQ magazine's interview with Rielle Hunter.

There's too much greatness in the article to quote just one bit. Instead, have a read and ponder how a woman whose business cards read "BEING IS FREE: RIELLE HUNTER, TRUTH SEEKER" managed to (a) get close enough to ambulance chaser-turned-presidential candidate-turned-trivia question John Edwards to have his love child, and (b) carry on this affair while escaping the attention of the mainstream press, which for some reason came down with a sudden case of decorousness.

Either way, it's pretty clear America - and the world - dodged a bullet with this one.


Bookmark and Share

Print This Post 1 Comments

« Prev Next »

Recent Posts

Archive