Mau-mauing the Maoist flak-catcher

By James Morrow in Sydney

19 October 2009


One of the first rules of public speaking is, "be careful whom you quote". If you're a reasonably educated human being, therefore, it should be obvious that you don't cite Pol Pot if you're giving a speech about agricultural policy, and you don't look to Adolf Hitler, vehement anti-smoker that he was, for words to back up an address on the evils of tobacco.

Nor should one, if addressing a group of high school students (or anyone else, really), refer to a man whose reign of terror resulted, conservatively, in the deaths of 60 million people as one of your favourite political philosophers - which is just what White House Communications Director Anita Dunn did recently.

Watch the tape - it's pretty damning. Or if you don't feel like wading through the speech, here's the choice bit: "In 1947, when Mao Tse-tung was being challenged within his own party, on his plan to basically take China over, Chiang Kai-shek and the nationalist Chinese held the cities, they had the army, they had the air force, they had everything on their side and people said how can you win, how can you do this, how can you do this against all odds against you, and Mao Tse-tung said 'You fight your war and I'll fight mine.' Think about that for a second, you don't have to accept the definition of how to do things and you don't have to follow other people's choices in the past."

Even if it was a joke, it was not a funny one. Indeed, it sounds more like outright admiration for a man whose perverse brand of anti-intellectual Marxism that was simultaneously brutally centralised yet scarily anarchic gave his countrymen the horrors of the Great Leap Forward, the Cultural Revolution, and a gulag system that exists to this day. (Perhaps this is why Barack Obama was so quick to snub the Dalai Lama?)

Look, forget the Obamas' long-standing friendship with Bill Ayers and Bernadine Dohrn. The fact is, the Obama White House is rapidly becoming a big tent for the sort of cranks who set up card tables on the fringes of growers' markets and pass out hand-xeroxed fliers.

Yes, 9/11 "truther" Van Jones lost his "green jobs" czar role, but that leaves plenty of largely unaccountable individuals like science advisor John Holdren who used to advocate forced abortions and a "planetary regime" to control population, or legal advisor Harold Koh.

Koh, let's not forget, is the high-ranking legal advisor who has spoken out in support of sharia law, discounted the notion of the US Constitution as the supreme law of the land (he prefers global, transnational arrangements), and written the still-confidential advice the Obama administration has used to brand the constitutional removal of Honduras's Chavezista president "a coup".

In this depressing context, it's no wonder Anita Dunn fits right in.

All the more reason for her to be kicked out.

Bookmark and Share

Print This Post

Comments

bigbooner

2:34 AM on Tue 20 October 2009

Never heard referred to as a "philosopher" before. Guess I am going to have to rethink what I call Hitler and Stalin.

Eugene Dillenburg

3:42 AM on Tue 20 October 2009

From 1978-1982, I studied Advertising at a small liberal-arts college. My copy writing teacher, a young guy, professional in the field, said it was OK to include a photo of Hitler in an ad featuring famous vegetarians. I argued that associating Hitler to any product or idea made me feel much less favorable toward it, and thus less likely to purchase whatever is being advertised. But he said no, "Hitler is a vegetarian" is the kind of interesting tidbit that would attract readers' attention. He didn't seem overtly radical (the fact that he worked in advertising made him pariah among the school's liberal elite). He was actually pretty down-to-Earth, famous for writing beer and pizza commercials. Hitler was just a way of getting attention.

(He also told me that quoting Mies van der Rohe's dictum "Less is more" was elitist and would turn readers off.)

I do not offer this as a defense of Dunn nor as a critique of academia (nor of advertising), but simply to note that historical ignorance is sadly widespread, even among the educated.

PersonFromPorlock

6:10 AM on Tue 20 October 2009

Fussbudget that I am, I feel a need to point out that dinner guests chez Hitler were invited to 'light 'em up' after the meal. Try THAT with your modern anti-smoker: Hitler at least understood that being a host wasn't all about him.

It's very odd, but the phrase "anti-smoking nazi" is the only one I can think of that actually slanders the real nazis.

RebeccaH

7:07 AM on Tue 20 October 2009

Never mind kicking the thoroughly ignorant Anita Dunn out. Kick the whole rotten regime out, I say.

Worst. President. Ever.

Worst. Congress. Ever.

Worst. Political Class. Ever.

I Call BS

1:32 AM on Wed 21 October 2009

Mao considered himself a philosopher. Anybody who quotes him for anything they wish to promote, other than the need for eternal vigilance against totalitarian, murderous, fascist, phony "populist" regimes, is a dangerously ignorant delusional. An (interim) White House Communications Director who quotes him this way deserves to be scraping the congealed grease out of filth-encrusted drains on hot, humid days, in alleys behind lousy Chinese restaurants in bad parts of town. What an ignorame-ass.

You Missed Kevin Jennings

11:04 AM on Wed 21 October 2009

Let's not forget the "Safe Schools Czar" who's teaching our kids about Harry Hay -- and not so they'll know to call the cops if they see someone like Harry hanging around the schoolyard.
Conservatives may be dour and scolding, but they'd never turn a pedophile into a civil rights icon.

Have your say

Name
Comment

Next: American zombieland.

Previous: Fools rush in

Recent Posts

Archive